In the business of theology it is hard not to be controversial - Jurgen Moltmann

Thursday, 30 August 2007

5分46秒音樂歷史 :: history of music

Simply AWESOME!
講多無謂,自己看。

7 comments:

輝記 said...

精采極了!看完,一個大O嘴掛在臉上!音樂的魔力,叫人興奮!

Dot said...

超正!
小提琴好靚好型!
不過可否介紹一下影片出處,同呢班係乜友!

Yam 飲者 said...

影片來自www.snotr.com,(應該)是個開了不久的網站,專門放精采短片;至於本片出自何處,無從考究。
那個絃樂組合來頭甚大 — 是本網誌開業以來唯一獨立feature的音樂組合,其他進一步的,抱歉,也無從考究。

ton^chat said...

http://www.stringfever.co.uk/

Yam 飲者 said...

謝謝提供。

有感而發:所以你話而家讀博士幾難呢!論文寫到最後,甚至寫完之後,甚至N年之後,都隨時有人會彈出來,指出你某個某個資料來源不準確,某個字眼的出處交代不夠仔細,當堂死火,輕者過不到口試,重者畢了業也會收回學位。幸而這隊組合不是我的研究範圍,台灣話話齋,好加在!

HCDC said...

oh... sorry guys... I even can't finish the clips... I am not meaning to be rude... but.. why you think it is awesome? I couldn't get it... in which aspect you think it is great?

Yam 飲者 said...

It's perfectly okay, no one has the obligation to agree that something is awesome or great. Afterall, who would expect HCDC to coincide in taste with 輝記?In a similar note, I cannot sit through the films of Hou Hsiao Hsian except his first two or three, and (almost) always macha when watching most films of Wong Kar Wai (again, except the first two or three).
For this particular piece, if (I say IF) you are not particularly interested in or somewhat knowledgeable of the historical development of (western) classical music (and/or more broadly speaking, European aesthetics and philosophy of the last few hundred years), you'd be turned off immediately. Or, on the contrary, if you are a classical music fundamentalist who thinks that any variation to the masters' works is blasphemous, you'd even be pissed off.